The Competition Commission of India (CCI) recently rejected a plea from digital entities concerning Google’s payment policies, which has buoyed the tech giant’s outlook. Despite this, experts note that the CCI’s back-to-back orders – one favoring and one against Google – do not provide a definitive advantage to either party.

Opinions are divided on the implications of the denial of interim relief. Anupam Shukla of Pioneer Legal stated that it would be unreasonable to expect Google to continue offering its Play Store platform for free, as the CCI did not find sufficient merit in the app developers’ request to halt fees. Ultimately, parties will need to negotiate commercial terms for listing apps on the Play Store.

The CCI has been hesitant to grant interim relief unless there are compelling reasons, as mandated by the Supreme Court. While some experts feel that preliminary evidence warrants such relief, others, like Augustine Peter, believe that compensation can remedy any harm caused during the investigation. Despite the dismissal of interim relief, CCI’s order stresses that it does not reflect a final stance on the case’s merits.

Alay Razvi of Accord Juris LLP believes the petitioners have a strong case, indicating that interim relief should have been granted. Nonetheless, the CCI’s order emphasizes that it does not indicate a final opinion, and that investigations should proceed impartially.

For more information visit at https://happenrecently.com/zepto/?amp=1